Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020812113036.I17166@mail.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS
Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:15:46AM -0500, Greg Copeland wrote: > If by "turn...on", you mean recompile, that's a horrible idea IMO. Ah. Well, that is what I meant. Why is it horrible? PostgreSQL doesn't take very long to compile. > I guess what I'm trying to say here is, it's moving the problem from > being a postgres specific issue (not compiled in -- having to recompile > and install and not knowing if it's (dis)enabled) to a general body of > knowledge (does my system support such-n-such capabilities). The problem is not just a system-level one, but a filesystem-level one. Enabling 64 bits by default might be dangerous, because a DBA might think "oh, it supports largefiles by default" and therefore not notice that the filesystem itself is not mounted with largefile support. But I suspect that the developers would welcome autoconfig patches if someone offered them. A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M6K 3E3 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: