Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I don't have trouble with 128, but other than standards compliance,  I
> > can't see many people getting >64 names.
> 
> One nice thing about 128 is you can basically forget about the weird
> truncation behavior on generated sequence names for serial columns
> --- "tablename_colname_seq" will be correct for essentially all
> practical cases.  At 64 you might still need to think about it.

Oh, good point.  Does anyone remember the performance hit for 64 vs 128
namedatalen?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026