Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> > We can always tell people who are doing embedded application work to 
> > bump *down* NAMEDATALEN.
> 
> Good point.  Okay, I'm OK with 128 ...

Yes, good point.  I think the major issue is pushing stuff out of the
cache because we have longer names.  Did we see performance hit at 128? 
Seems it more that just disk space.

I don't have trouble with 128, but other than standards compliance,  I
can't see many people getting >64 names.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026