Re: CLUSTER and indisclustered
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CLUSTER and indisclustered |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200208040322.g743MrS26717@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | CLUSTER and indisclustered (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Tom, should we be updating that flag after we CLUSTER instead of > > requiring an ANALYZE after the CLUSTER? > > Could do that I suppose, but I'm not super-excited about it. ANALYZE is > quite cheap these days (especially in comparison to CLUSTER ;-)). I'd > settle for a note in the CLUSTER docs that recommends a subsequent > ANALYZE --- this seems no different from recommending ANALYZE after bulk > data load or other major update of a table. OK. I am sure it is not obvious to people to ANALYZE because the data in their table hasn't changed, just the ordering. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: