Re: Questions regarding contrib/tsearch
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Questions regarding contrib/tsearch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020802114703.E8966@mail.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Questions regarding contrib/tsearch (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Questions regarding contrib/tsearch
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 09:39:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > If the database is being accessed heavily then it will tend to remain > swapped in; you don't have to (and really can't) do anything to tweak > the kernel-level and Postgres-level algorithms that determine this. > What you want is to ensure there's enough RAM to hold not only all the > database hotspots, but also all the other programs and working data > that the server machine will be running. I was wondering: is there an in-principle reason that there isn't any mechanism for locking a table in memory, or is it just that no-one has ever done it? A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M6K 3E3 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: