Re: getpid() function
От | nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: getpid() function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020801144423.GA4630@klamath.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: getpid() function (Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: getpid() function
Re: getpid() function Re: getpid() function Re: getpid() function |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 12:01:52PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > Is there some common convention of names? No, there isn't (for example, pg_stat_backend_id() versus current_schema() -- or pg_get_viewdef() versus obj_description() ). Now that we have table functions, we might be using more built-in functions to provide information to the user -- so there will be an increasing need for some kind of naming convention for built-in functions. However, establishing a naming convention without breaking backwards compatibility might be tricky. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: