Re: lock listing

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 03:15:56PM -0400, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 14:47, Neil Conway wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:34:19PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Yes, I think that would be the way to go, or look at the stat functions
> > > > that return tuple sets and use those.  That may be a cleaner solution.
>
> [...]
>
> > Lastly, it'll show up in \dS if it's a sudo table.  The function is
> > buried in thousands of \df results.
>
> I'm confused: I thought that Bruce was suggesting that I change the
> lock status functions to be similar to the stats functions (i.e. one
> function for every piece of data and a view that pulls them all
> together).

No, sorry, I wasn't suggesting that.  Is that how they do it?  Yuck.  We
well do the table function as soon as Joe has it working 100%.  So will
have virtual tables created two ways, one the pg_stat way and the other
the FRS way.  Seems fine to me.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026