Re: lock listing
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: lock listing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200207311834.g6VIYJ801805@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: lock listing (nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway)) |
Ответы |
Re: lock listing
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Yes, I think that would be the way to go, or look at the stat functions that return tuple sets and use those. That may be a cleaner solution. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neil Conway wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 03:11:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > We have pg_stat_activity. Seems pg_locks should behave the same, > > without the (). Let it show up in \dS. Do you need assistance with > > this? I know FRS is neat, but logically it seems it should appear as a > > table like that statistics stuff. > > So I should just add a view called "pg_locks" that calls the table > function? > > I'll submit a new patch once Joe's anonymous composite type patch gets > into CVS. > > Cheers, > > Neil > > -- > Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com> > PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: