Re: WAL file location
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL file location |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020731105003.B28840@mail.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL file location (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: WAL file location
Re: WAL file location |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 10:23:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info> writes: > > a. The system uses no environment variables at all; some other > > method is used to determine where the config file is (maybe compiled > > into the code); > > > If I understand it, nobody is really arguing for (a). > > I am. I see absolutely no advantage in depending on environment Ok, how then would one set the location of the config file? Though I mentioned it, I don't really thing that compiled-in is an option: I don't want to have to have four versions of the binary to just to run four postmasters on four ports. Maybe a --with-config-file option to start the postmaster? And I presume this is all for the server only, right? Nobody is talking about getting rid of (for instance) $PGPORT for clients, right? (I'm sorry if I seem obtuse, or if this is really none of my business, since I'm not offering to fix this up, since I can't. But I'm very keen to make sure that administration of large postgres installations doesn't become terribly difficult.) A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M6K 3E3 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: