Re: Open 7.3 items

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> ... My own opinion is
> >> that there is nothing broken there; certainly nothing so broken that
> >> we need to force a change under schedule pressure.
> 
> > I don't feel we are under pressure.  We have time to discuss and address
> > it.
> 
> Well, it's all a matter of how you look at it.  Isn't the point of your
> post that began this thread to start giving people a sense of time
> pressure?
> 
> I agree that if we could quickly come to a resolution about how this
> ought to work, there's plenty of time to go off and implement it.  But
> (1) we failed to come to a consensus before, so I'm not optimistic
> than one will suddenly emerge now; (2) we've got a ton of other issues
> that we *need* to deal with before beta.  This one does not strike me
> as a must-fix, and so I'm loathe to spend much development time on it
> when there are so many open issues.

Well, it is up to the individuals involved.  If someone wants to deal
with it, and gets a consensus, and comes up with a patch, let them.

The list is for time pressure on those items.  It does not affect new
items.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026