Re: [PATCHES] prepareable statements
От | nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] prepareable statements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020725210024.GA24045@klamath.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] prepareable statements (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] prepareable statements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 10:54:04PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I'm not sure I like that. It seems too confusing. Why not keep > it as the standard says? (After all, it is the PREPARE part that > we're adjusting, not EXECUTE.) I think it's both, isn't it? My understanding of Tom's post is that the features described by SQL92 are somewhat similar to the patch, but not directly related. On the other hand, if other people also find it confusing, that would be a good justification for changing it. Personally, I think it's pretty clear, but I'm not adamant about it. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: