Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 01:21:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Why does this patch arbitrarily remove the #ifdefs and documentation
> > for USER_LOCKS? That seems quite unrelated to the stated purpose.
>
> I probably should have mentioned that -- it looked like dead code,
> and the behavior that it referred to (a loadable module called
> user-locks.c, which doesn't make sense to begin with) doesn't
> appear to exist anymore.
Is it contrib/userlock/?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026