Re: CLUSTER patch

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
>
> Given that this patch is specifically stated not to work:
>
> >> Anyway, there's still a big problem with this patch: the pg_depend
> >> information gets messed up after CLUSTER, so a clustered table cannot be
> >> dropped.  I don't know why is this.

Wow, that is strange since it has the same oid as before.

> I object to it being applied now.

Oh, I didn't see that part of his message; will remove from queue.  I
know I was waiting to hear if the proper way to drop the temp table was
using object drop or drop it directly.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026