Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020705112429.Q22387-100000@mail1.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am being interviewed by OReilly ) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am
Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > > Actually, the "big" change is such that will, at least as far as I'm > > understanding it, break pretty much every front-end applicaiton ... > > Only those that inspect system catalogs --- I'm not sure what percentage > that is, but surely it's not "pretty much every" one. psql for example > is only affected because of its \d commands. Okay, anyone have any ideas of other packages that would inspect the system catalog? The only ones I could think of, off the top of my head, would be pgAccess, pgAdmin and phpPgAdmin ... but I would guess that any 'administratively oriented' interface would face similar problems, no?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: