Re: listen/notify argument (old topic revisited)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: listen/notify argument (old topic revisited) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200207031756.g63Huf502610@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | listen/notify argument (old topic revisited) (Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-hackers@empires.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> themselves. (I'd also be inclined to include the hash code in the > >> transmitted message, so that readers could more quickly ignore > >> uninteresting messages.) > > > Doesn't seem worth it, and how would the user know their hash; > > This is not the user's problem; it is the writing backend's > responsibility to compute and add the hash. Basically we trade off some > space to compute the hash code once at the writer not N times at all the > readers. Oh, OK. When you said "transmitted", I thought you meant transmitted to the client. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: