Re: First Win32 Contribution (Was: Re: Democracy and
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: First Win32 Contribution (Was: Re: Democracy and |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020620145647.J89987-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: First Win32 Contribution (Was: Re: Democracy and (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Jan Wieck wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > > > > On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > This line bothers me. With multiple people working on Win32, I would > > > like us to decide how we would _like_ such a port to be implemented. I > > > think this will assist those working on the project to _know_ that their > > > work will be accepted if submitted. > > > > 1. that is not accurate, as it won't necessarily be accepted if submitted > > ... its not like years ago when are standards were lax ... Jan is > > perfectly accurate in his assessment of which will make it in, except for > > omitting one point ... it has to meet our standards ... so, its more "the > > first to contribute *and* meet our standards" ... > > Omitted point taken :-) > > > > What I don't want to happen is two Win32 projects contributing duplicate > > > code at the same time. It is a waste when they could have combined > > > their efforts. > > > > IMHO, that is actually their problem ... without meaning to sound crass > > about it, but its not like we haven't discussed it extensively here, and > > openly ... hell, we've even tried to break down the whole project into > > smaller components to make the whole easier to merge in :) > > The problem with this kind of project is that you have a big stumbling > block at the beginning, which has to be done before you can rollout and > integrate the help of developers scattered around the globe. This was > the case with the foreign key project, where the trigger queue and one > set of triggers where working, and then Stephan did all the others and I > forgot who else helped to do the utility commands and CREATE TABLE > syntax and tried to decrypt the SQL definitions? In the Windows port Actually, IIRC Don did the triggers, and I did the utility commands/create stuff, but the point is still the same. (Made in the point of historical accuracy since I don't want someone else's work to end up getting attributed to me since that's unfair to them. :) )
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: