Re: Highly obscure and erratic
От | Varun Kacholia |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Highly obscure and erratic |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020619144408.C6054@voxel.cse.iitb.ac.in обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Highly obscure and erratic (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Highly obscure and erratic
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> how does this differ from: > > select * > from dbmedia > where dbmedia.id=wdmedia.id > and wdmedia.word='whatever' > limit 200; hey... thanks for that.. that was surely better... but now returning to the main point... how can i execute the following query in the form above? select * from dbmedia where id IN ((select ID from wdmedia where word='word1') INTERSECT (select ID from wdmedia where word='word2') ...so on) thanks again > I think it's called "pilot error". Your query asked to run the subquery for > each row in the outer query, so ofcourse you get a sequential scan. If what > you wanted was an index scan then you should rewrite it as a join (as above) > and use that. > > If you can prove that your EXISTS statement is equivalent to the JOIN for > all different types of subqueries, perhaps it can be made automatic. > -- > Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > > There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those that can do binary > > arithmetic and those that can't. > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- ------ Varun Best file compression around: "DEL *.*" = 100% compression
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: