Re: Pg 7.2B5 -> 7.2.1
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pg 7.2B5 -> 7.2.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200206190956.37470.lamar.owen@wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pg 7.2B5 -> 7.2.1 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Pg 7.2B5 -> 7.2.1
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday 19 June 2002 09:21 am, Tom Lane wrote: > "Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders@acm.org> writes: > > way to go. The first is an install using a Redhat RPM (teg's) and I > > haven't decided on how to go with the 7.2.1 but probably a Redhat RPM > > from the RHL 7.3 distribution. > However, I'd be less confident that two randomly-chosen RPM releases > will be binary-compatible --- they might have been built with different > choices of install directory, default PGDATA directory, etc. Given that > you used teg's beta RPM I'd recommend you stick with his release RPM. Trond released two different sets of 7.2.1 RPM's -- one for Red Hat 7.2, and one for Red Hat 7.3 (which was the set actually shipped with Red Hat 7.3). My PGDG RPMset for 7.2.1 was built on Red Hat 7.3. When in doubt about 'binary compatibility' -- read as: 'all library versions the same', use your good friend 'rpm --rebuild' and grab the source RPM. Red Hat 7.3's source RPM is as good as any, although I'm a little biased to the PGDG set.... Documentation on rebuilding from source RPM is packaged with the RPM distribution as README.rpm-dist, which is available as part of the source RPM in the /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES directory if you just 'rpm -i' the source RPM. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: