Re: join question - three tables, two with foreign keys to

On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Dmitri Colebatch wrote:

> maybe just to qualify, I get this:
>
> select emp.name, lv.from_date, lv.to_date, pay.amount
> from employee as emp
> left join employee_leave as lv on emp.id = lv.employee_id
> left join employee_pay as pay on emp.id = pay.employee_id
> where emp.id = 1;
>
>  name | from_date  |  to_date   | amount
> ------+------------+------------+--------
>  dim  | 2002-10-05 | 2002-05-14 |    100
>  dim  | 2002-10-05 | 2002-05-14 |    100
>  dim  | 2002-10-06 | 2002-06-14 |    100
>  dim  | 2002-10-06 | 2002-06-14 |    100
> (4 rows)
>
> but would expect the results to be
>
>  name | from_date  |  to_date   | amount
> ------+------------+------------+--------
>  dim  | 2002-10-05 | 2002-05-14 |   (null)
>  dim  | 2002-10-05 | 2002-05-14 |   (null)
>  dim  |       (null)      |      (null)        |    100
>  dim  |       (null)      |      (null)        |    100
> (4 rows)
>
> am I missing something?

I don't see why you'd expect that.
Both rows in employee_leave match and both rows
in employee_pay match.  They're not unrelated joins,
you're asking to join employee with employee_leave
and then join the results of that with employee_pay.

Perhaps you want a union? Something like:select emp.name, lv.from_date, lv.to_date, null as amountfrom employee as emp,
employee_leaveas lv where emp.id=lv.employee_id
 
unionselect emp.name, null, null, pay.amountfrom employee as emp, employee_pay as pay where emp.id=pay.employee_id

If you want to get a row for an employee even when they
have neither leave nor pay, you can use left joins above,
but that'll give you some rows that'll be like
<name> NULL NULL NULL.