Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead,
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead, |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200206110956.g5B9upv15456@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead, ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > 2. Once Branch created, any *partially implemented* features will get > > > rip'd out of the -STABLE branch and only fixes to the existing, fully > > > implement features will go in > > > > Now, that is an interesting idea. > > Ya, I thought it was when you -and- Tom proposed it :) > > I quote from a message on June 8th: > > ======================= > Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > So, I we should: > > > Warn people in July that beta is September 1 and all features > > > have to be complete by then, or they get ripped out. > > > > I thought that was more or less the same thing I was proposing... > ======================== What I thought was interesting was having the CURRENT branch keep the feature so the guy could continue development, even if we disable in STABLE. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: