Re: UPDATE ... FROM vs standard SQL
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UPDATE ... FROM vs standard SQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200206071150.55227.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: UPDATE ... FROM vs standard SQL (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Richard, > Tell me about it. Where I'm using MySQL on client web-servers I find myself > porting the data into PG to massage it then putting the results back into > MySQL. One of the things missing from the various reviews/comparisons on the > web is any actual comparison of usage for DBA tasks (as opposed to handling a > message-board app etc) But MySQL does handle message-baord apps very well. If only MySQL AB and NuSphere would stick to that and not try to poach in transactional database space ... > Nope - mostly work with PG/MySQL/MS-SQL/Access. I use all the features at the > psql prompt, but like to stick to the standard for app-generated queries. Well, this will work on any database with *full* SQL92 support: UPDATE tablea SET field3 = (SELECT field5 FROM tableb WHERE tableb.field2 = tablea.field1); ... and won't be as slow as an IN query. Quite. However, MS SQL 7.0 does not support correlated subqueries outside of the WHERE clause (I'm not sure about SQL 2000). For MS Access, well, forget using subqueries at all unless you have all day ... And for MySQL, you're hosed. Tell your clients they need a different database. -- -Josh Berkus ______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________ Josh Berkus Complete informationtechnology josh@agliodbs.com and data management solutions (415) 565-7293 for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533 and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: