Re: UPDATE ... FROM vs standard SQL
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UPDATE ... FROM vs standard SQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020607093629.Y37907-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | UPDATE ... FROM vs standard SQL (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Richard Huxton wrote: > I've been happily using statements like > UPDATE a SET flag=1 FROM b WHERE a.id=b.id AND b.foo='x'; > > While PG's FROM extension makes life simple, I can't believe there's not a way > to do an update on a join using standard SQL. The two options I can think of > are: > > 1. using a sub-select > UPDATE a SET flag=1 WHERE a.id IN (SELECT id FROM b WHERE b.foo='X'); > Which is fine, but no good for mysql, hits PG's speed issue with IN and a bit > clumsy for more complicated examples. Well, on PG you might want to try some EXISTS form, but I think this is the way you're probably intended to do it under SQL92 at least. > 2. building an updatable view. Well, AFAICS this is mostly a special case of the above. It looks to me that updatable views can't have multiple tables in the from clause so you'd have to write the select with a subquery anyway (and I'm not 100% sure that's correct either).
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: