Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200206070559.g575xNu22859@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at> writes: > > No comment on a planned 7.3 timeframe? :-( > > I think we are planning to go beta in late summer (end of August, say). > Probably in July we'll start pressing people to finish up any major > development items, or admit that they won't happen for 7.3. So we've > still got a couple months of full-tilt development mode before we > start to worry about tightening up for release. I am concerned about slowing down too early. We did that in previous releases and didn't get the beta focus we needed, and it was too paralyzing on people to know what is to be slowed and what to keep going. I think a slowdown two weeks before beta would be fine. Basically, I think the slowdown lengthened the time we were not doing something productive. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: