Re: Search from newer tuples first, vs older tuples first?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Search from newer tuples first, vs older tuples first? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200206020609.g5269P213073@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Search from newer tuples first, vs older tuples first? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Search from newer tuples first, vs older tuples first?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my> writes: > > OK I'm starting to get it :). Will the index behaviour be changed soon? > > When someone steps up and does it. I've learned not to predict > schedules for this project. It is not that hard to implement, just messy. When the index returns a heap row and the heap row is viewed for visibility, if _no_one_ can see the row, the index can be marked as expired. It could be a single bit in the index tuple, and doesn't need to be flushed to disk, though the index page has to be marked as dirty. However, we are going to need to flush a pre-change image to WAL so it may as well be handled as a normal index page change. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: