Re: ksqo?

Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org> writes:
> > Hmmm... Well, I'll take a look at it, but I'll probably just leave it
> > be -- since the optimization might actually return invalid results, it
> > doesn't seem like a very valuable thing to have, IMHO.
> 
> Yeah, I never cared for the fact that it altered the semantics of the
> query, even if only subtly.  But I'm hesitant to rip out something that
> someone went to the trouble of writing and contributing ...

If it does nothing, we certainly should remove it from GUC so people
don't see a meaningless option.  We can then keep it in CVS to see if we
want it later.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026