Re: Q: unexpected result from SRF in SQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ian Barwick
Тема Re: Q: unexpected result from SRF in SQL
Дата
Msg-id 200205261904.04964.barwick@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Q: unexpected result from SRF in SQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sunday 26 May 2002 17:58, Tom Lane wrote:
(...)
> If anyone does someday resurrect fjoin-like functionality, a reasonable
> SQL-style syntax for invoking it would be
>
>     SELECT (bar(1)).*;
>
> which would still leave us wanting to raise an error if you just write
> "SELECT bar(1)".

The reason why I posted the question is that I had defined a function
that should have worked, but kept giving me back strange numbers,
so I spent a whole five minutes trying to debug the function before
I realised I was calling it in the wrong way (doh). An error here would
be a Good Idea, IMHO.

Ian Barwick




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Olivier PRENANT
Дата:
Сообщение: WAL FILES
Следующее
От: Ian Barwick
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers