Just PR (was: Stability, PR)
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Just PR (was: Stability, PR) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020523154723.I28942@mail.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Stability, PR (Jason Earl <jason.earl@simplot.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Just PR (was: Stability, PR)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 09:35:12AM -0600, Jason Earl wrote: > Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> writes: > > One of the nicest things about the PostgreSQL team is the lack of FUD > > and marketing fluff. > > How does one prove something? By developing a history of success, not by > > claiming it. And folks like yourself help a lot by showing success. > > > > - Thomas > > I couldn't agree more. The PostgreSQL team is honest to a fault about > the true state of the codebase. They will happily tell you which > parts of the code are still somewhat scary. On the other hand, when > they say that something is ready for prime time, you can be assured > that it *is* ready for production use. While I agree completely with these sentiments, it does strike me that one of the (many) sad bits about the demise of Great Bridge was the death of the marketing efforts that they were able to undertake. I had a recent experience which reminded me that the full-blow bull-pucky claims of certain "unbreakable" systems stick in the minds of those "non-technical techies" someone was recently bemoaning. And, like it or not, those guys make a lot of decisions. Worse, there are a lot of _bona fide_ Old Fart techies who are just not as plugged into the current technology as they once were. They've been promoted (?) to mangle^H^H^Hagement, and they are asked to make decisions that they are really no longer informed enough to be making. In such cases, they are likely to reach for the "safe" bet, even if there's nothing especially safe about it. So, a little PR goes a long way. But a _lot_ of PR goes a much longer way, and may make the little PR unheard. It struck me earlier today that maybe what free RDBMS need is something like USENIX and SAGE. That way, there'd be a consistent voice focussing just on the RDBMS world, pointing out the advantages of systems like PostgreSQL. It also struck me that there might already be such a thing. Is there? And if not, is there any reason to hope that one could get it going without having a lot of pointless name-calling about (for instance) whether MySQL really belongs? A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M6K 3E3 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: