Re: Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200205221714.g4MHEHc02933@saturn.janwieck.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com> writes: > > Also, in btree haven't we had some problems with index page > > splits when using entries large enought so that not at least > > 3 of them fit on a page? > > Right, that's why I said that the limit would only go up to ~10K anyway; > btree won't take keys > 1/3 page. What's the point then? I mean, someone who needs more than 8K will outgrow 10K in no time, and those cases are topics for comp.databases.abuse.brutal ... Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: