Re: Join of small table with large table
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Join of small table with large table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020513090304.W99254-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Join of small table with large table (large scale <largescale_1999@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 10 May 2002, large scale wrote: > Hi, > > I have two tables, one has 25000 rows and the other > has 6.5 million rows. > > (25000 rows) > table1 > (id text, > start int, > stop int) > > with seperate index on three individual fiels. > > 6.5 million rows > table2 > (id text, > start int, > stop int) > > with seperate index on three individual fields. We'll start with the standard questions: Have you vacuum analyzed? What version are you running? (if it's less than 7.2, you may want to see about upgrading) If you do a set enable_seqscan=false; what does the explain show then? I'd be interested in know if 1024601931 is even remotely a valid number of rows from that join as well (which is about .5% of an entire cartesian join if my math is right). Perhaps some exists style thing would be faster since that would at least presumably be able to stop when it found a matching table2 row for a particular table1 id.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: