On Wed, 8 May 2002, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > 3) If (2) is the case, then development could continue under the BSD
> > license, since developers could use the BSD-original code for their
> > development work. So there is no risk of "backflow polution".
>
> Can PostgreSQL, Inc be the GPL distributor for these purposes, being a
> separate entity from the PostgreSQL Global Development Group?
Ummmm ... no? We tend to be anti-GPL over here, since its anti-business
... gborg would be a good place for any of this ...