Re: How much work is a native Windows application?
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How much work is a native Windows application? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020508081509.16063d15.nconway@klamath.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How much work is a native Windows application? ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: How much work is a native Windows application?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 8 May 2002 01:03:37 -0300 (ADT) "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> wrote: > On Tue, 7 May 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > > > It'd be worth trying to understand cygwin issues in detail before we > > sign up to do and support a native Windows port. I understand the > > user-friendliness objection to cygwin (though one would think proper > > packaging might largely hide cygwin from naive Windows users). What I > > don't understand is whether there are any serious performance lossages > > from it, and if so whether we could work around them. > > Actually, there are licensing issues involved ... we could never put a > 'windows binary' up for anon-ftp, since to distribute it would require the > cygwin.dll to be distributed, and to do that, there is a licensing cost Why? Isn't Cyygwin GPL'd? From http://cygwin.com/licensing.html I don't see anything that would require licensing fees for OSD-compliant software. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: