Re: Cygwin-Postgres-IpcMemoryCreate
От | Jason Tishler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cygwin-Postgres-IpcMemoryCreate |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020429192716.GK1152@tishler.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Cygwin-Postgres-IpcMemoryCreate (Barry Pederson <bp@barryp.org>) |
Список | pgsql-cygwin |
Barry, On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 12:02:04PM -0500, Barry Pederson wrote: > So if people need another way to reproduce the problem, one way at least > for me is to create a new database, import a single extremely large > (100+mb) object, pg_dump it with something like: pg_dump -b -Ft -f > foo.pgdump.tar mydbname, and then try to restore it with something like: > pg_restore -Ft -d mydbname foo.pgdump.tar Thanks for the test case. > It'll only take one or two tries for the backend to bail out. So, it doesn't happen every time? Sounds like a timing issue that triggers the infamous MS Windows "feature" that prevents two processes from opening the same file. > So maybe there is something funky going on with link/unlink, and rename > would be a better choice on cygwin. Would someone be willing to take the lead of this one and strace or debug (i.e., via gdb) this problem? If so, I would be willing to take the results to pgsql-patches or cygwin-developers as appropriate. Thanks, Jason
В списке pgsql-cygwin по дате отправления: