Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
| От | Jan Wieck |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200204291839.g3TIdcB16397@saturn.janwieck.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > What happens inside of a nested transaction, assuming we do have those > evenually ... ? Folks, I don't really get it. We had a voting and I think I saw a clear enough result with #1, transactional behaviour,as the winner. Maybe I missed something, but what's this disscussion about? Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: