Re: intel vs amd benchmark for pg server part 2
От | pgsql-gen Newsgroup (@Basebeans.com) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: intel vs amd benchmark for pg server part 2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200204290410.g3T4A1B10828@basebeans.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | intel vs amd benchmark for pg server part 2 (postgres@vrane.com) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] intel vs amd benchmark for pg server part 2 From: Vic Cekvenich <vic@basebeans.com> === Or a disk caching controler (like Mylex or Penging Computing) Any DB is IO bound. Michael Loftis wrote: > > > Curt Sampson wrote: > >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 postgres@vrane.com wrote: >> >>> Another gripe I have is that vacuum process does not eat up 100% >>> of cpu. In the beginning it peaks around 80% and at the end >>> it is stuck around 20%. >>> >> >> That's because your disk subsystem is too slow for the machine. >> Put in a disk subsystem that doesn't slow down the machine, and >> you'll use all your CPU. >> >> Then you can complain about not using all your disk I/O capacity. >> >> Performance bottlenecks never go away. You can only move them around. >> > Thats why we all call it "chasing the brass ring" :) > >> >> cjs >> > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: