Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200204251550.g3PFoRc18121@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Just curious here, but has anyone taken the time to see how others are > doing this? For instance, if we go with 1, are going against how everyone > else handles it? IMHO, its not a popularity contest ... Yes, good point. I don't know that they use SET, but if they do, we should find out how they handle it, though I doubt they have thought through their SET handling as well as we have. My guess is that they do 3, honor all SETs. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: