Re: Performance Issues
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance Issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020425093313.M65761-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Performance Issues ("Shaun Grannis" <shaun_grannis@hotmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> # EXPLAIN SELECT ln, count(1) FROM data_table GROUP BY ln; > > NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: > > Aggregate (cost=19538149.27..19864263.69 rows=6522288 width=19) > > -> Group (cost=19538149.27..19701206.48 rows=65222884 width=19) > > -> Sort (cost=19538149.27..19538149.27 rows=65222884 width=19) > > -> Seq Scan on data_table (cost=0.00..2324610.84 rows=65222884 width=19) > > > > The last name (ln) and the year of birth (yb) is indexed, but that > shouldn't matter because it's doing a sequential scan, correct? Am I > running into the limitations of Postgres? We'd like to eventually get I didn't see anything about your settings in postgresql.conf, but increasing the sort_mem parameter may help that really expensive sort step. I think the desired fix for this would probably be the TODO entry on hash based aggregates but that's still in the future...
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: