Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > OK, the votes are in:
> > > >
> > > >         #1
> > > >         Lamar Owen
> > > >         Jan Wieck
> > > >         Tom Lane
> > > >         Bruce Momjian
> > > >         Joe Conway
> > > >         Curt Sampson
> > > >         Michael Loftis
> > > >         Vince Vielhaber
> > > >         Sander Steffann
> > > >
> > > >         #2
> > > >         Bradley McLean
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >         #3
> > > >
> > > >         #?
> > > >         Thomas Lockhart
> > > >         Hiroshi Inoue
> > > >
> > > > Looks like #1 is the clear winner.
> > >
> > > I voted not only ? but also 2 and 3.
> > > And haven't I asked twice or so if it's a vote ?
> > 
> > Yes, it is a vote, and now that we see how everyone feels, we can
> > decide what to do.
> > 
> > Hiroshi, you can't vote for 2, 3, and ?.
> 
> Why ?
> I don't think the items are exclusive.

Well, 2 says roll back only after transaction aborts, 3 says honor all
SET's, and ? says choose the behavior depending on the variable.  How
can you have 2, 3, and ?.  Seems ? is the catch-all vote because it
doesn't predefine the same behavior for all variables.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026