Re: updated qCache
От | Karel Zak |
---|---|
Тема | Re: updated qCache |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020418105518.B13923@zf.jcu.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: updated qCache (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 06:05:59PM -0400, Neil Conway wrote: > On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:34:45 -0700 > > I'm not saying it's a bad idea, I just think I'd like to > concentrate on the locally-cached plans for now and see if > there is a need to add shared plans later. Yes, later we can use shared memory buffer as "pipe" betweenbackends: Backend A: Backend B:local-memory-query-plan --> shmem --> local-memory-query-planIn this ideais in the shared memory one query-plan only and backends use it for plan copying from "A" to "B". It require persistent backends of course. Karel PS. it's idea only and nothing other, the original qcache was idea only too :-) -- Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: