Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin as production database
От | Jean-Michel POURE |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin as production database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200204161001.10444.jm.poure@freesurf.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin as production database ("Steve Slatcher" <steve_slatcher@scientia.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin as production database
|
Список | pgsql-cygwin |
Le Mardi 9 Avril 2002 09:56, vous avez écrit : > Thanks for that Tim. Could I please ask everyone else though if the > silence means "of course it's fine in a production environment" or "I > wouldn't dream of even considering it". If you think it doesn't make for > an interesting discusion mail me directly. Many thanks. Cygwin is a POSIX emulation layer which works perfectly. The only concern might be speed: because of memory allocation issues, large database ***might*** run twice as fast under Linux as under Cywin. Anyway, Cygwin + PostgreSQL still remains faster than any open-source databases available under Windows. With hardware being cheaper everyday, this kind of question becomes old-fashion. Users discover PostgreSQL under Cygwin, and one day or another, invest in a new platform running under Linux. A powerfull Athlon server does not cost more than 1.000 euros. So why bother with Windows? Maybe you should have a look at pgAdmin2, PostgreSQL Windows GUI. Personnaly, I recommand using PostgreSQL servers under Linux and pgAdmin2 under Windows. pgAdmin2 is based on pgSchema ocx, a database abstraction layer, which can be used in any Windows project. Other source of information to dig into the PostgreSQL world: http://pgadmin.postgresql.org http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php http://techdocs.postgresql.org Cheers, Jean-Michel POURE
В списке pgsql-cygwin по дате отправления: