Re: RFC: Generating useful names for foreign keys and checks

Yes!  Please do something with those unnamed constraints.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm thinking of doing a patch to generate foo_fkey and foo_chk names for
> fk's and checks.  I know that this will make using DROP CONSTRAINT a whole
> heck of a lot easier.  There have also been a few people who've complained
> on the list about all the <unnamed> foreign keys, etc.
> 
> I know Tom had some fears, but I don't know if they still apply, or if
> they're any worse than the current situation?
> 
> Can I go ahead?
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026