Re: Bug #631: pg_dumpall does not accept -F or -f
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug #631: pg_dumpall does not accept -F or -f |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200204102229.g3AMTc428601@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug #631: pg_dumpall does not accept -F or -f (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug #631: pg_dumpall does not accept -F or -f
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > > The pg_dumpall script seems to ignore the file and format switches > > > > that are used with pg_dump. pg_dumpall always writes to stdout in > > > > text format. Also, the -b switch can not be used with pg_dumpall > > > > since text output is being forced. > > > > > > That's not a bug. > > > > Peter, can you explain why to the user; it is not clear to me why > > either, though I have my suspicions, and shouldn't we throw an error to > > the user when they try it? > > The pg_dumpall reference page explicitly cautions against this situation. I see that now: Any other command line parameters are passed to the under- lying pg_dump(1) calls. This is useful to control some aspects of the output format, but some options such as -f, -t, and dbname should be avoided. However, it seems we should explicitly throw an error if someone tries to use these flags. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: