Re: timeout implementation issues

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Take out a database other than PostgreSQL and do
> 
> > BEGIN; -- or whatever they use; might be implicit
> > INSERT INTO existing_table ('legal value');
> > barf;
> > COMMIT;
> 
> > The INSERT will most likely succeed.  The reason is that "barf" does not
> > modify or access the data in the database, so it does not affect the
> > transactional integrity of the database.
> 
> No; this example is completely irrelevant to our discussion.  The reason

Actually, we could probably prevent transaction abort on syntax(yacc)
errors, but the other errors like mistyped table names would be hard to
prevent a rollback, so I guess we just roll back on any error.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026