Re: 16 parameter limit

John Proctor wrote:
>
> RE:  16 parameter limit
> 
> There was a message posted in March regarding this.   Bruce replied that this 
> issue did not come up often.   However, I think there is more to it than 
> that.   I think one reason that it does not come up is because most Oracle 
> DBAs are not going to dig through mailing lists and take the time to post 
> questions.   Once they discover that PL/pgSQL != PL/SQL they just move on.   

Actually, I said it didn't come up much, but I know of several heavy
PL/pgSQL users who do have trouble with the 16 parameter limit, and I am
looking into increasing it.  If someone wants to do some legwork, go
ahead.  I do think it needs to be increases.  The lack of complains
makes it hard for me to advocate increasing it, especially if there is a
disk space penalty, but personally, I do think it needs increasing.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026