Re: timeout implementation issues

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > Why should the timeout be reset automatically ?
> > 
> > It doesn't need to be reset automatically, but the problem is that if
> > you are doing a timeout for single statement in a transaction, and that
> > statement aborts the transaction, the SET command after it to reset the
> > timeout fails.
> 
> As for ODBC, there's no state that *abort* but still inside
> a transaction currently.

Yes, the strange thing is that SET inside a transaction _after_ the
transaction aborts is ignored, while SET before inside a transaction
before the transaction aborts is accepted.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026