Re: JDBC with PostgreSQL 7.2
От | Thomas O'Dowd |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JDBC with PostgreSQL 7.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020403081814.G9908@beast.uwillsee.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | JDBC with PostgreSQL 7.2 ("Tom Hargrave" <Tomh@fisher.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi Tom, Are you using the latest driver? A patch went in after 7.2 was released to fix a problem that caused a out of range exception. Pre 7.2 drivers will also not work with a 7.2 database as the timestamp format is more accurate in 7.2. If you are using the latest driver, can you send me the stacktrace of the exception and if you can the particular timestamp that is causing it. By latest driver I mean either built from cvs or the one at http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html under the development driver section. Cheers, Tom. On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:23:11PM +0000, Tom Hargrave wrote: > Hi, hope this is the right email address. > > We are in the process of upgrading and have encountered problems with TimeStamps with JDBC. > > When trying to insert a record and then retrieve it we get a "String index out of range" exception thrown. It looks asthough the "nano" section is causing the problem, if I edit the record and remove it, the record can then be retrieved. > > Any ideas/patches would be much appreciated. I enclose the code that worked on previous releases. > > Thanks, Tom > > Insert/Update Code (works but seems to truncate nano) > ================================== > _preparedstmt.setTimestamp(1, new java.sql.Timestamp(new Date().getTime())); > > Retrieve Code (Only works after nano removed) > ============================= > java.util.Date _tmpdate = (java.util.Date) _resultset.getTimestamp(2); -- Thomas O'Dowd. - Nooping - http://nooper.com tom@nooper.com - Testing - http://nooper.co.jp/labs
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: