Re: pg_temp.XX.0
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_temp.XX.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200204030613.g336D1P12032@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_temp.XX.0 (Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
You can stop the postmaster and start the postgres binary with the -O flag and delete the pg_temp tables. We don't have a cleanup for these failed backends but we should. Normally they are cleaned up. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Daniel Kalchev wrote: > I found out, that there are some probably temporary relations in one of my > databases, with names (that show in vacuum verbose output) like > pg_temp.12720.0. > > Are these the result of CREATE TEMP TABLE or simmilar and if so, can such > relations be safely dropped? Perhaps a good idea to add some vacuum > functionality to do this. > > Daniel > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: