Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200203260509.g2Q59bG07229@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > Marc G. Fournier writes: > >> Try her out and let me know if there are any problems ... the build looks > >> clean, sizes all look right ... > > > ... but the contained documentation is for 7.3. > > On the subject of contained documentation, I notice > > *** postgresql-7.2.1/doc/src/sgml/version.sgml Mon Mar 18 18:04:11 2002 > --- REL7_2/doc/src/sgml/version.sgml Thu May 10 21:46:33 2001 > *************** > *** 3,7 **** > documentation. In text, use for example &version; to refer to them. > --> > > ! <!entity version "7.2.1"> > ! <!entity majorversion "7.2.1"> > --- 3,7 ---- > documentation. In text, use for example &version; to refer to them. > --> > > ! <!entity version "7.2"> > ! <!entity majorversion "7.2"> > > Is this right, or should "majorversion" still be 7.2? Right offhand > the latter seems correct ... I wasn't sure what to do here. I figured if the docs were regenerated, it should say 7.2.1, and if they aren't, then they will stay as 7.2. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: