Re: Notify argument?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Notify argument? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200203202027.g2KKRu814341@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Notify argument? (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Notify argument?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Neil Conway wrote: > > Is it too difficult for it's usefulness? > > AFAICT it shouldn't be too difficult. However, there is a note in the > TODO list referring to breaking backwards compatability with the > "pgNotify API". Exactly how backwards compatible do we need to be? The breakage will come when we lengthen NAMEDATALEN, which I plan to tackle for 7.3. We will need to re-order the NOTIFY structure and put the NAMEDATALEN string at the end of the struct so differing namedatalen backend/clients will work. If you want to break it, 7.3 would probably be the time to do it. :-) Users will need a recompile pre-7.3 to use notify for 7.3 and later anyway. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: