Re: Dependence beetwen Function
| От | Dan Langille |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Dependence beetwen Function |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20020312191441.B37933F0E@bast.unixathome.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Dependence beetwen Function (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Dependence beetwen Function
|
| Список | pgsql-admin |
On 12 Mar 2002 at 9:18, Stephan Szabo wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Gaetano Mendola wrote: > > > Hi to all > > > > Suppose that I have the function A that use the fucntion B. > > When I drop and reconstruct B I should also reconstruct A. > > Can I avoid this ? > > Is a really problem with hundreds of function around. > > If you're using 7.2 you can use create or replace function > rather than drop function followed by create function. I just finished updating my SP and RI functions to take advantage of this. While doing that I starting thinking about triggers. Checking the documentation, I don't see a similar feature for triggers. I'm guessing that triggers do not suffer from the same problem as that which prompted the original post. -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: