Re: psql and output from \?
От | Ian Barwick |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql and output from \? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200203112355.AAA01152@post.webmailer.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql and output from \? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql and output from \?
Re: psql and output from \? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 12 March 2002 00:34, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Ian Barwick writes: > > So with no further ado I humbly submit the attached patch, which builds > > on your patch and tidies up / harmonises the \? output. > > That looks a lot better. A few things, though: > > The change to \a seems to be wrong-headed. What do you mean by "wrong-headed"? That it should read "toggle aligned output mode" ? (Would be more logical). > The line for \du speaks of "configured" users. There are no > "unconfigured" users. That line was from the patch by Rod Taylor (March 1, 2002). Didn't think to change it. Does "list users" do the job? BTW psql-ref.sgml also says "Lists all configured users (...)" > \set should be \set [NAME [VALUE]], or strictly speaking even \set [NAME > [VALUE [...]]]. True. I actually started out with: \set [NAME [STRING]] set internal variable (no name: list all; no string: '') which is (almost) accurate but verbose. > Some lines seem to be in excess of 80 characters. Longest line is 74 columns (or 77 with the \set line above). > I guess some of these weren't introduces by you, but if someone is going > to fix this, he might as well take care of these. Will submit another patch in the morning (it's late here). Ian Barwick
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: